Skip to main content

What Juries in Maryland Actually Look Like

Episode by Jobeth Bowers
Youtube video

What Juries in Maryland Actually Look Like

If you’ve spent any time watching legal dramas, you’ve absorbed a very specific picture of what jury selection looks like: high-stakes psychological profiling, lawyers who know everything about every potential juror, elaborate mirror juries running in parallel. It makes great television. It also bears almost no resemblance to what happens inside a Maryland courthouse.

As someone who has practiced personal injury law in Cecil County for nearly two decades, the last twelve exclusively here in Elkton, I can tell you that when I watch those shows, all I want to do is yell at the screen. So let’s talk about what a Maryland jury actually is, how they’re selected, what they know about your case, and the one fact that insurance companies spend millions of dollars hoping juries never figure out on their own.

Most Cases Never Reach a Jury

Here’s something that might surprise you: despite practicing in this space for nearly twenty years, our firm tries a case in front of a jury less than once a year. In Cecil County, it’s closer to once every eighteen months. The vast majority of personal injury cases settle before they ever get to a courtroom.

That said, understanding how juries work isn’t just academic. The possibility of a jury trial shapes the negotiation on every case. Insurance companies know when an attorney is willing to go the distance, and that willingness changes what they’re willing to offer. Some of our largest settlements have come ten days before trial, when the other side finally decided they’d rather pay than roll the dice. So even if your case never sees a jury box, knowing how this works matters.

How Jury Selection Works in Maryland

A week or so before trial, the attorneys for both sides submit questions to the judge. Many of these are standard questions that have been used for a century. They’re designed to surface actual bias, not to build a psychological profile of every person in the room, but to find out if anyone has a prejudice that would prevent them from being impartial.

A common example: Would you give more weight to a law enforcement officer’s testimony simply because of their position? The flip side of that question is asked too. Neither extreme is useful in a juror. These questions are consolidated between the judge and both attorneys, and then the entire panel is brought into the room at once.

What the Judge Actually Asks the Room

Here’s where it gets notably un-cinematic. The judge reads the questions to the entire room. If your answer to any question is yes, you stand up and stay standing until your juror number is recorded. That’s it. There’s no conversation, no sidebar, no personal interview. You stand, they record, you sit.

If there are enough prospective jurors who didn’t stand for anything, the judge might simply say: you eight, come over here,  any reason you can’t be this jury? No? You’re the jury. And that’s it, without recording a single response from a single one of them.

I saw this firsthand during my time in the clinical program at the University of Baltimore, when I had the opportunity to try a criminal case as a law student under the supervision of the Public Defender’s office here in Cecil County. After the selection process, the person placed at juror number one, who hadn’t stood for any of the questions, responded to the judge with “okay,” because they almost certainly didn’t speak fluent English. Nothing in the process had caught it.

That’s an isolated example, but it illustrates something real: the jury you end up with is genuinely uncertain. Jurors might not have been paying close attention. They might have misunderstood a question. That uncertainty is a risk for both sides, plaintiff and defendant alike.

What Jurors Are Told About Your Case

Jurors are explicitly instructed to know nothing about the case before they walk in. They’re told not to research the accident, the location, the parties, or the attorneys. If it’s a multi-day trial and there was an accident at a particular intersection, they are told: do not drive out there. Do not search for anything on Google, Bing, or any other platform.

Everything the jury learns about your case is supposed to come through the formal channels of the trial, witness testimony, medical records and bills, your own account of what happened, and the observations of people in your life who can speak to how things have changed. Friends who notice you can’t fish anymore. Co-workers who see what the injury has cost you. Family members who have lived through the difference. A jury has no other way to know any of this unless they hear it in that room.

What Insurance Companies Do Not Want Juries to Know

If you are in a civil trial over accident damages, the person sitting at the defense table is typically not the person who is going to write the check. It is their insurance company. The attorneys defending that case are paid by the insurance company. The expert doctors who come in to argue that you are not as hurt as you say are paid by the insurance company. The entire defense is funded by a corporation whose sole interest is in minimizing what they pay you.

And the jury is not told any of this. Not one word.

Why? Because legally, the insurance company is not technically a party to the lawsuit. You are suing the individual who caused the accident. The court has determined that introducing the insurance angle would unfairly prejudice the jury. So in the name of fairness to that individual, the jury deliberates without knowing who is actually going to be paying.

I have preached about this on this podcast before, and I will keep saying it: if you are ever selected for a jury in a civil accident case and you believe the injured person deserves compensation, give them what they deserve. It is not coming out of the pocket of the person sitting at that table. It never was. I can tell you that here. I am not allowed to tell you in that room.

What This Means for Your Case

Juries are unpredictable by their nature. The process is designed to be impartial, but it is fundamentally unscientific. You don’t always know who you’re getting, how closely they were listening, or what’s going on in their lives that day. That uncertainty is part of what our team weighs on every case, how far do we take this, and when does the risk of a jury outweigh the certainty of a settlement?

What I’ve found over years of practice here is that being prepared, being aggressive, and being willing to push the case as far as it needs to go is often what moves the needle. When the other side knows you’re ready to walk into that courtroom, they negotiate differently. If you’re a client of mine, we’ll talk through every step of this as it becomes relevant to your situation.

We handle cases primarily here in Cecil County, and occasionally for Cecil County residents whose accidents happened elsewhere in the state. If your accident happened somewhere else entirely, we’ll connect you with a trusted partner who knows that jurisdiction the way we know ours.

Get a Free Auto Insurance Policy Review

Upload your declarations page at marylandinsurancebook.com and get a plain-English report card on your coverage, what it does, what it doesn’t, and how each part would affect you if you were in an accident. I am not an insurance agent. I won’t sell you anything. I will explain what you have. You take that information to your agent and make the decisions that fit your budget. Call us today to learn more. 

Jobeth Bowers

Episode By Jobeth Bowers

Maryland Attorney Jobeth Bowers is the founder of Bowers Law and a graduate of the University of Baltimore School of Law

Schedule a Free Consultation with Jobeth Bowers